|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Slade Hoo
Amarr
Corpse Collection Point
   |
Posted - 2010.03.12 20:21:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Slade Hoo on 12/03/2010 20:21:43
Mining will be dead!
This won't be a solution for suicide ganking because in a short amount of time mineral prices will adapt to new insurance payouts.
------
Make Lowsec useful! Vote in the CSM-Forum! |
Slade Hoo
Amarr
Corpse Collection Point
|
Posted - 2010.03.13 08:33:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: Akita T
All hands, brace for major laughter.
Let the mineralopocalypse begin !
this
------
Make Lowsec useful! Vote in the CSM-Forum! |
Slade Hoo
Amarr
Corpse Collection Point
|
Posted - 2010.03.13 09:39:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Ran Khanon
edit: Apparently T2 payouts get buffed now on Sisi. (Needs confirmation).
Anyone with access to sisi can confirm this?
------
Make Lowsec useful! Vote in the CSM-Forum! |
Slade Hoo
Amarr
Corpse Collection Point
|
Posted - 2010.03.13 10:39:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Tulisin Dragonflame
We'd probably see a huge rise in PvP instead, with the opportunity cost being so low.
We won't. The price of t1 ships after insurance will still be as it is today. There is no difference between a 50m geddon with 45mio insurance payout and a 30m geddon and 25m payout.
------
Make Lowsec useful! Vote in the CSM-Forum! |
Slade Hoo
Amarr
Corpse Collection Point
|
Posted - 2010.03.13 18:09:00 -
[5]
Originally by: DigitalCommunist
Cool. I hope they remove insurance on capital ships too, while they're at it. Its easily the biggest and dumbest insurance mistake they ever made.
hey...you an insured t2 carrier will cost around 300-400m. This is very much for a ship 
But even when ccp makes those insurance changes live...capitals won't be affected at all.
------
Make Lowsec useful! Vote in the CSM-Forum! |
Slade Hoo
Amarr
Corpse Collection Point
|
Posted - 2010.03.15 13:42:00 -
[6]
Edited by: Slade Hoo on 15/03/2010 13:46:05
Edited by: Slade Hoo on 15/03/2010 13:45:46
Only possible solution to mining can either be:
a) remove mineral offer (nerf drone regions, rat loot or ore)
or
b) increase demand for minerals (increase BPOs building costs)
to ensure offer and demand is in balance. Which also solves the insurance-problem as a secondary effect.
------
Make Lowsec useful! Vote in the CSM-Forum! |
Slade Hoo
Amarr
Corpse Collection Point
|
Posted - 2010.03.15 19:16:00 -
[7]
Edited by: Slade Hoo on 15/03/2010 19:16:00
Originally by: Seishi Maru
You can make you not receive insurance if you die to same player again in less than 24 hours. Making unreasonable to have so many characters to make real proffit form that.
Will still be exploitable and be done by players. And if mineral prices drop and insurance stays the same.....well. 4 Accounts, 12 Chars = 12x insurance fraud with 20mio (example) isk gain per ship. Nice income
------
Make Lowsec useful! Vote in the CSM-Forum! |
Slade Hoo
Amarr
Corpse Collection Point
|
Posted - 2010.03.15 20:11:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Slade Trillgon
How about scaling the returns from insurance according to skill points.
Hi Slade, (awesome name me thinks)
Scaling like we got it in medical clone pricing? Or a decrease in insurance payout from 100% (50k SP) to maybe 50% (5m SP) that is fixed around 5m SP?
Well..nice idea..but yet another reason to create an alt for this (you don't even have to train them) to do your insurance fraud stuff for you.
------
Make Lowsec useful! Vote in the CSM-Forum! |
Slade Hoo
Amarr
Corpse Collection Point
|
Posted - 2010.03.15 20:48:00 -
[9]
Ok...my counter: train "insurance alt" (tm) to BS III which is under 4m SP and trainable in a few days.
Would be so great if the solution to this would be ****ing simple 
------
Make Lowsec useful! Vote in the CSM-Forum! |
Slade Hoo
Amarr
Corpse Collection Point
|
Posted - 2010.03.16 14:03:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Malcanis
Possibilities include:
(1) Drone alloys refining to moon minerals
(2) Drones wrecks yielding more salvage
(3) Drone faction modules and ships (would be p popular)
(4) Some new previouslyunobtanium stuff like specialised decryptoresque itmes required
I really like Option No. 1. But this would lead to an infinite supply of moon minerals..consequences could be fatally for t2-business.
No2. : is ok for me.
No3. : CCP already stated that there will be no rogue drone ships in eve. But i like your idea of drone guns, etc.
In another forum there was a suggestion about also adding more stuff like parts for special drones (augmented, integrated,etc.).
------
Make Lowsec useful! Vote in the CSM-Forum! |
|
|
Slade Hoo
Amarr
Corpse Collection Point
|
Posted - 2010.03.16 15:27:00 -
[11]
reducing insurance output won't solve your suicide-gank problem or costs for ships after insurance. get familiar with eve economy and post again, thanks.
------
Make Lowsec useful! Vote in the CSM-Forum! |
Slade Hoo
Amarr
Corpse Collection Point
|
Posted - 2010.03.17 17:00:00 -
[12]
Originally by: Motseth
CCP needs to balance highsec versus nullsec profit, people living in highsec must understand they are almost risk free.
You suppressed lowsec in your calculations.
------
Make Lowsec useful! Vote in the CSM-Forum! |
Slade Hoo
Amarr
Corpse Collection Point
|
Posted - 2010.03.18 22:20:00 -
[13]
Originally by: NEMESIS SIN
Threadnought closed.
No. No yet |
Slade Hoo
Amarr
Corpse Collection Point
|
Posted - 2010.03.22 03:05:00 -
[14]
What do you expect of CCP Chronitis' Devblog regarding insurance that has been mentioned in the test server forum?
------
Make Lowsec useful! Vote in the CSM-Forum! |
|
|
| |
|